Been noticing some epistemology problems, logical fallacies, omissions of info, etc. at the edges of the “truthers” efforts which take away from very valid and begging questions from their sober wing (ie. Dr. S. Jones, Griffin). That’s a big problem, but also maybe an opportunity.
It’s a problem for their (stalled?) movement generally because it discredits the lot of them. It’s an opportunity in that it presents a way to criticize the fallacies in the movement while elevating the reasonable questions and questioners.
I hope to have more on this — maybe an article out — in some small number of months.




0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
You must be logged in to post a comment.